By the end of conducting your literature search and evaluation, you should know why your research question is important (according to data from empirical studies), the variables that have been studied in reference to your larger research questions, what methods have been used to measure those variables, how those variables are connected to each other (mediating, moderating, correlating, extraneous, intervening), what the field of psychology still doesn’t know about your variables and their connections to each other, any limitations of studying these variables, and the strengths and weaknesses of the study designs to date. If you don’t know the answers to these, it is likely that you aren’t done with your literature review and you need a better understanding of the research so far. You may need to look up definitions, deep read your articles again until you fully understand the study, and find any gaps you have in your knowledge of these variables.
In your research paper, you are moving from summaries of individual research studies to creating a larger story on your research topic. You are writing a narrative with your paper of the research that has already been done and where it should go next (your own research study). In that narrative, you are giving the history of the study of your larger research question, making comparisons between studies, pointing out gaps, and explaining strengths and weaknesses of the studies and their findings.
One way to synthesize the literature is to break it up into specific variables. For each variable:
Since many of your studies are looking at the same variables, you can't simply summarize each one individually, you need to look at all of them as a whole to answer these questions.
Empirical studies are based entirely on research. They are direct and to the point, utilizing research to back up every part of the paper.
Use this APA 7th edition template and check out the APA Guide.